Michael's Sports Blog

USC Appeal Denied

The NCAA’s “Infractions Appeals Committee upheld all findings and penalties against USC in their infractions case involving former players Reggie Bush and O.J. Mayo.”  This decision was very disappointing to the school, and many officials of the school were upset.  The USC appeal had “asked that the 30 scholarships lost over three years with a maximum of 75 allowed and a two-year postseason bowl ban be cut in half.”  However, the NCAA upheld the ruling.

The ruling makes sure that USC will have less scholarships than teams not under sanction-those not under sanction can have 85 scholarship players on the roster-and seniors are allowed to transfer without having to sit out a year.  The decision to deny the appeal also will not allow USC to play in the first Pac-12 championship game, as well as a postseason bowl game.  The basketball team did not receive any more sanctions.

I’m not a fan of the NCAA’s decision.  I know I am a fan of USC so obviously I am upset, however, the NCAA has taken other similar issues more lightly, so I think their decision against USC is unfair.  There are many teams who have used ineligible players or have been rumored to have paid players to come to the school, but nothing has been done that has been as detrimental to the program as the sanctions against USC.

Recently, Ohio State has been in the news for players and coaches violating NCAA rules.  The coach of the Buckeyes, Jim Tressel, knew his players were receiving tattoos in return for signing/selling memorabilia, yet he did nothing to stop this.  The players were therefore ineligible, but the coach continued to play them, allowing the team to make it to the Sugar Bowl.  The players and coach were suspended for the first five games of next season and also had to forfeit most of their wins from the previous season, but nothing has affected their postseason ability or scholarship amount.  As you can see, USC football was harmed much worse than the Buckeyes.


May 26, 2011 - Posted by | NCAA Football, Sports | , , , ,


  1. jim Tressel is a cheat but , he cheated by keeping his best players on the field . USC cheated to get the recruits in the first place . Reggie’s mom loved her new home , while the only thing OSU players recieved was a free tatto . lol Not hardly the same deal in value . hahahah

    Comment by Brutis Buckeye | May 31, 2011 | Reply

  2. Yes, Reggie’s mom received better benefits than the OSU players, however, both players were ineligible but still played during the season. This is the reason they both deserve punishment similar to each other.

    Comment by Michael Altschuler | May 31, 2011 | Reply

    • wrong ! You might want to read more about the cases from other sources than readers digest . USC refused to help with the NCAA investigation , this came from the NCAA , USC also was quilty of knowing and buying Reggie and Mayo off . This is totally different from the OSU case where the school has helped with the investigation , was not involved in any wrong doing , and from what the ncaa has said already , The Ohio State Univarsity has a model compliance office , unlike USC who’s office refused to help the NCAA . You must be a USC fan or live in a cave . Sorry to ruin your day !

      Comment by Brutis Buckeye | August 25, 2011 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: